Other claims by SEISCO when compared to conventional water heaters include:
Increased Reliability Solid state controls avoid overheating (provide longer element life), eliminate flow switch failures, eliminate minimum flow & pressure requirements, and the unit has a nylon resin molded tank
Uniform water temperature the system controls maintain water temperature across all flow rates
Energy Savings elimination of standby tank losses (0.350 kWh per day)
Unlimited hot water supply
Smaller Tankless Water Heater Installation space required
Unit Meets UL and other standards for system contact with potable hot water
Less peak demand contribution than "storage type" electric water heaters (element controls are energized only for short periods while tank elements are energized during use and recovery)
Power Quality, April 22, 1997
Delmarva Power (now Conectiv)
SEISCO Water Heater Test Report
by David B. Vannoy
Manager, Power Quality Services
Delmarva Power
"
test consisted of the following: starting with cold pipes, the tub hot water faucet was turned to the full open position. Water was run for about four minutes. Voltage and current were monitored using an RPM Omega power monitoring system
"
Voltage:
"
The fluctuation between the voltage minimum and maximum resulting from current modulation as the RMS current dropped from its initial peak to the succeeding minimum is approximately 1.8 volts or 0.7%
"
Current:
"
the initial current of approximately 117 amperes fell off to 20 amperes and returned to a peak of approximately 90 amperes. It then oscillated between 60 and 90 amperes during the remainder of the test. The period of this oscillation is such that it does not seem to produce noticeable flicker.
there is no appreciable current waveform distortion,,,"
Voltage Harmonic Distortion:
"
the maximum voltage harmonic distortion to be a maximum of 1.4%."
Flicker:
"Flicker appears to be substantially reduced from earlier models
"
4. Comparative Study, Executive Summary, December 1987
Southern California Edison, SDSU
Comparative study between the Aqua Systems electric instantaneous water heaters, a conventional, residential Title-24 electric storage-type water heater, and a conventional, residential Title-24 natural gas storage-type water heater.
by Sandra Ellis
submitted to:
SDSU Energy Engineering Institute,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
San Diego State University
San Diego, CA 92182
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
"The objective of this project was to perform a comparative study between electric storage-type, gas storage-type, and electric instantaneous water heaters for residential energy customers in the Southern California Edison service territory."
"In new construction and in retrofit applications, it was determined that all three models of the Aqua Systems electric instantaneous water heaters, Models R22, R25, and R28, were not only more energy efficient but were also more cost-effective than the electric storage-type water heater tested, even with an additional insulation blanket installed
"
[Aqua Systems is the predecessor to the SEISCO Continuous Water Heater.]